Neil Danton

…including completely flooding the basement of the prestigious Lewis Glucksman Gallery in University College Cork. Kind-of created a bit of a problem, as that’s where artworks are stored when an exhibition finishes, before being returned to their source.

It rains a lot in Cork of course, but this was ever so slightly over-the-top rain. It was like India in monsoon season this past winter, and so when an already just-about-breaking-it’s-banks river had a gazillion tons of water released into it from the dam up-river, the city ended up like Venice on a bad day (and I know Venice on a bad day, I lived near it for some time).

A couple of months later and I was assigned by one of the “Sundays” to create some images for one of their magazine supplements. This was to be a “How is it now?” type feature after most of the art that was damaged has undergone a conservation process. Not much to be done on images showing the actual conservation, but some of the work was back on display, and that would do me. Of course I’d need to add a yooman-been into the images as well, as that’s what I mostly do, make images with yoomans in them (well apart from wedding images of course, I’d rather eat a bucket of s…..).

So, luckily for me the Director of the gallery was available to be photographed. Pause for a moment now, while you imagine some kind of mad-professor type (like astronomer Patrick Moore) wearing a tweed jacket with elbow patches.

Fortunately, SHE is nothing like that. There is one problem with her though (it’s OK F, don’t panic), she wears glasses (eyeglasses for U.S. readers). Very nice they look too, BUT, glasses as with anything reflective, can create a problem when using flash lighting. I want to see my subjects eyes, not a big flare from the glass, so particular care is needed when making images with a subject wearing glasses.

So here’s a little look at how I lit this assignment. For once I kept quite a few of the setting-up and testing shots to give me enough ammunition for this post.

So here’s one of the images (the one that was used in the magazine btw):

Looks simple enough right?

Except, this was the starting point at the aperture & shutter speed I wanted to work at:

I started off with half an idea that I was going to try and get away with the one-light approach, but in reducing the flare on the painting, I was starting to get too much of a side-lit portrait. That’s not too bad if the subject is a man and you want dramatic lighting, but for a lady? I don’t think so. There was too much “fall-off” to the right side of the painting as well:

I really needed to get some separation as well. No, not as in “Six Degrees of Separation”, I just needed one degree, subject – separation – painting. The separation is basically just getting some light behind the subject in order to “lift” them away from the backdrop, so they don’t merge into too much of a “flat” image.

So, I was going to keep the one-light (Ezybox softbox) as the key from left, but add a second light as the fill from the right. Hmm, small problem, there’s a wall in the way.

Time I think for the famous napkin lighting-diagram, except I can’t find a white paper napkin, so it’ll have to be kitchen roll:

As is customary with extremely accurate and highly complex Technical Plans & Drawings, I offer the following warnings:
Not to scale.
Double-check all measurements.
If in doubt ask.

That gave me just about what I wanted:

And the final image again:

The umbrella just put some nice soft light between subject and painting. If you want to see it larger it’s on my website in the Editorial section. Can’t put a permalink to the specific image as I move things around in the portfolio, but it won’t be far from the start. I think the image really “pops”.

I then went for something slightly different, and put subject and a part-restored piece on the floor, softbox on subject, and umbrella into ceiling bouncing back for art-piece. Shame it still needed to be covered as part of the conservation, but we rotated it until there was enough clarity to see what it was:

In between those two images, I made another one, but I saved it until last, as it’s my favourite.

There was a wall where there was some descriptive text regarding the conservation. This was the ambient light that I had to work with:

Similar lighting problem to image-one there though. Too much direct flash and the writing would disappear. Not enough and it would be too dark to see that any writing was there at all. Solution was similar to the first image, except softbox and umbrella reversed like this:

And the resultant image:

So there it is.

The Glucksman Gallery is a fabulous place to visit if you happen to have some time when in Cork. Wonderful location, fabulous (award winning) building, great exhibitions and ADMISSION IS FREE!! (make a donation though, it’ll cost you less than a couple of cappuccini). Open every day except Mondays. No-one gets in on Mondays, unless you happen to be a photographer on assignment .

TTFN

…metaphorically and literally.

When on a commission I normally try and get the “safe” shots first, and then go for something more interesting. In this instance though, because of the timing being rapidly approaching dusk, I went the other way around.

This commission was to create some images for the launch of the Ashbourne & Purcell cup-finals week-end. These are competitions for 3rd level institutions (University age) in the sport of Camogie. Camogie is the ladies form of the men’s game of hurling with a few subtle rule changes. It looks a bit vicious with lumps of wood being flailed around, but has less injuries caused than Gaelic Football.

As always I was trying to think up something that would be a little bit different and when they sky started turning nice I knew I had the shot in mind.

So in reverse order of timing, the standard shot:

Two-light, no modifiers.

The slightly more interesting shot:

One light, white shoot through.

The nice sky (and the “oops missed shot”):

and the, well you decide:

Two-light, no modifiers.

TTFN

…no not that type of playing the field. Get your mind out of the gutter.

This is more like playing ON the field. I was assigned the other day / week / can’t remember exactly, to get a few portraits of one of the Cork Gaelic footballers, or is it Cork Hurlers?

Actually it’s both, as he’s going to be playing both codes this season. That used to be not uncommon, but with the increase in training and match schedules, in the last few years nearly everyone has opted to declare for one or the other. Even the legend that is Seán Óg decided that Hurling would be it, rather than continue with both.

Bear in mind, for those not of the Irish persuasion, that Gaelic Games is an amateur sport. These guys aren’t professional athletes. They have to work full-time, in addition to all the training for their chosen sport.

So the time for the assignment was set, and the journo was due to interview him at around the same time, which (at this time of year) was fast approaching dusk. As usual, journo had a ready-made excuse as to why he needed to go first (sorry Michael, couldn’t resist ), so it meant I’d be shooting in near darkness outside by the time he’d finished the interrogation.

The location was a hotel, which, in common with most modern hotels, is a bit restrictive in terms of backgrounds. Still, no worries, it was going to be pitch fricking dark anyway for the outside shots. At least said hotel has a little bit of a garden that I could probably make use of.

Did a couple of shots inside, a half-length:

and then a close-up:

There were also a couple outside:

and the stand-out image for me:

All images were the old favourite – one-light. The half-length was using a 24mm lens, the close-up a 135mm and the 2 outside using what is increasingly becoming my favourite lens – a 50mm. All those years of going round and round in circles with different lenses, going from wide-angle to wider-angle, and I’m now back where I was donkeys years ago, shooting a full-frame camera with a 50mm lens. Technology, PAH.

So which one was published? None of those above. No, as usual they published the only one I didn’t really like which I haven’t shown. Typical.

Lady readers please stop drooling before you go to work.

TTFN

…or is that artefacts?

I love it when a plan comes together (where have I heard that before?).

Was commissioned last week to cover the launch of the UCC Library online guide to the archive of Murphy’s Brewery*. Worrying thing about PR Photography and anything that mentions “online” is you can end up with “Man in Suit with Laptop” images, and as they are sometimes the only thing available as a very very very last resort for a business portrait, I didn’t want to use up any of my very’s on this occasion.

*Murphy’s is a beer, actually it’s a porter (stout). There are 3 made in Ireland, the most well know worldwide is probably Guinness, made in Dublin, so we won’t talk about that any more (they do great tv ads though). The other 2 are made in Cork, Murphy’s and Beamish, both now owned by Heineken, makers of the yellow stuff. Murphy’s started producing the famous black stuff in 1856 when James J, and his 4 brothers built a purpose designed brewery. Photography and now history lessons, I’m starting to spoil you.

So I could have done the launch, and it would probably have been OK, but this is where I get that “go the extra mile” itch that I’ve mentioned before. Fortunately the client knows me well, and it didn’t take much pitching from me before we decided that creating some images featuring some of the artefacts beforehand would be a nice addition to the actual launch.

My client arranged access for me to the Library and the Brewery and I’m glad we did it, because it was fascinating stuff. Lots and lots of records as you might imagine (no, not LP’s and singles, written recorded information).

Note for younger readers: LP’s and singles were what the old folks used to listen to before you listened to your music by sticking those plastic bits in your ears, and annoying everyone around you by cranking up the volume so that everyone around you on the same bus / train was plagued by two hours of listening to Chnnk Chnnk Chnnk Chnnk Chnnk Chnnk.

Made a few images of the Librarian and Library Archivist with Tenant Agreements and a Register of Workmen from 1913 – 1914:

I then did some detail on some of the register entries. In the image below, entry 129 shows a man employed as a Watchman, earning 3s/5d and 74 years old! It’s not entirely clear whether the 3s/5d is per day / per week etc., but I did some digging around on the interwebthingy and as best as I can figure out, it’s per day. Could be wildly wrong there of course, so if you’re a historian (get real Neil, why would a historian be reading your blog), or know a historian and can enlighten me I’d be interested to find out.

3s/5d is old pound (Sterling) currency of course and equates to about 19 pence / 21 Euro cents (29c U.S. ish). I could find out by digging around (isn’t the interwebthingy wonderful – sometimes) that that would be around £60 nowadays, that’s about €68 / $90, so it wouldn’t seem wildly inaccurate (as if I’d know about accurate, I’m a photographer not an actuary).

I just love the flowery writing.

Note for younger readers: Writing is how the old folks used to communicate with each other b4 evry1 sttd txtng n twtrng.

The next two images show another man aged 41 employed in the Tun Room (entry 102).

The interesting part is the entry from the right-hand page of the register, where it says “Volunteered. To be re-instated if returns” and “Volunteered for active service 18/8/14″:

It’s the “to be re-instated if returns” part that intrigues me. Did he manage to return from volunteering to fight in the first world war? Or did he end up, as so many did, dying in a field in France somewhere? I have an urge to find out more now. I might make it a bit of a project to try and find out.

That’s it then. Client was delighted with the media coverage we received. Anything else I need to tell you? Oh yes, the lighting. The images with the humans were all one-light, using an Ezybox softbox, and the detail images were with 2 flashes (strobes), no light-modifiers but just pulling out the wide-angle diffuser on the 580EX to soften the light a touch. No the paper doesn’t look white (I could have made it white by adjusting the colour correction) but that’s because it’s not white. It’s from 1914 after all. You’ll probably look a bit faded when you’re 96 years old as well.

TTFN